Philosophical Problems In Law
Professor David Fagelson
Fall 2018

 

 

Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Coordinates

     
  Class Hours/Venue: Monday/Thursday 4:05PM-5:20PM -- Kerwin 103
  Office Kerwin 248
  Office hours

Mon/Thursday 2:15PM - 3:45PM

  Virtual Hours Wednesdays 9:00-10:00pm & by appointment.
  Phone:Cell Number
Distributed in Class.
(Call or text me any time leave a message if I am out.)
  Course Web Site: http://academic2.american.edu/~dfagel/
 
 
top
You will be expected to look for any class assignments either here or on our blackboard site.


::



Materials

Readings will be made available as links from the Web site.top

 

 

Course Description

Content

Have you ever wondered what the difference is between the rule of law and the control of people through pure power? Have you ever thought about how you would proove that you had a certain right? Where would you look to find the sources of authority to show that you actually have a right to own a gun or that the death penalty is, or is not, cruel and unusual? Have you ever wondered why you ought to obey the law, apart from your fear of being punished? These are all philosophical questions of law of three distinct types. This course focuses on these three philosophical problems in law. The first, which is a question of definition, asks what it means to say something is the law. The second, is a question of sources. It concerns itself with where we look to find our law. The final question is one of morality. It concerns the extent and limits of our obligation to obey the law. More formally, these are respectively questions of legal, constitutional and political theory. A basic presumption of the course is that one cannot really understand these problems of law deeply without considering them together.

Skills

The majority of this course consists in abstract reasoning. Even when we apply these ideas to practical situations you will be challenged to consider them in the context of different theories of interpretion, different definitions of law and different principles of morality. It is not assumed that you have had any prior training in philosophical reasoning. However, it is assumed that you are comfortable thinking analytically and conceptually. The latter is particularly important. Philosophy concerns itself with the meaning of things. In many respects it is a matter of establishing definitions. You will not find the answer to these definitions in any dictionary or encyclopedia. In this course you will learn to parse ideas, look for internal contradictions in definitions, make analogies between different concepts and apply them all to existing problems in law and society. By the end of the course you should

  1. understand when institutions actually approximate some conception of the rule of law;
  2. be familiar with different theories of interpretation both of posited rules and moral principles.
  3. be familiar with different moral justifications for law and the limits of legal obligations, if any.
  4. be able to apply these ideas to different legal problems in public and private law.

 



 Requirementstop

 

*         Reading It is impossible to complete, let alone do well in, this class without doing each and every one of the readings. This is not a class where you can skip or forget to do the reading and just hope
to coast along.

*          Active class participation : all students are expected to attend class regularly and to be prepared to discuss the reading. Students may be called upon to participate in class and no passing is permitted. Each student will be allowed 2 un-excused absences. Any additional un-excused absence will reduce your final grade by one grade per absence. Study the class calendar carefully to make sure you don't have any prior commitments that would preclude you from meeting these requirements.

*          There will be two quizzes. These exercises will measure your comprehension of the reading.

*         There will be a mid term and a final exam.




Grading (subject to qualification described below)

Activity Weight Assigned Due Graded
         
Class Participation 20% Passim  
Test 25% October 1 In Class October 8
Test 25% November 12   November 19
Final 30% Thu, Dec 13, 2018-- 02:30PM-05:00PM

 

 

Grading standards are in part subjective and excellence in one area may compensate for deficiencies in another. No curve will be used to calculate the grades in this class. Hence, it is theoretically possible for every student to receive an A if he or she meets the standards for that grade. My primary goals are for each student to develop the critical thinking skills and to understand the ideas covered in this course by the time it is completed. If later exams and papers illustrate this proficiency, earlier grades which do not will be discounted. The following will give you a general guide to the typical performance associated with each letter grade.

A: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject

B: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material (or satisfactory understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject)

C: all course requirements met, work shows satisfactory understanding of course material

D: work fails to meet minimum course requirements, either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material

F: work falls far below minimum course requirements either in full and timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material.

 

University and Classroom Standards

Freedom of expression is at the root of academic discourse and the advancement of knowledge. This course will deal with a wide range of topics, some of which may challenge a student’s deeply held beliefs and perhaps even cause offense. While no topic will be censored simply because it has this effect, students are expected to treat the differing views of others with respect. While tolerance toward the opinions of others does not preclude expressions of disagreement, which are, indeed, encouraged, it does require that these expressions be based on the content of the ideas expressed and not on personal traits or values of the speaker. All class participants will be expected to tolerate the expression of opposing views and to engage in reasoned discourse about them. I will endeavour to insure that the classroom is free of any conduct that has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating or hostile environment. Furthermore, I will attempt to give each student an opportunity to express his or her own opinion and to treat student opinions with respect. Any student who believes that he or she has not been given adequate opportunity to contribute to class discussions is encouraged to bring this to my attention.

Extremely Important: If you experience difficulty in this course for any reason, please don’t hesitate to consult with me. In addition to the resources of the department, a wide range of services is available to support you in your efforts to meet the course requirements.

Academic Support Centre (x3360, MGC 243) offers study skills workshops, individual instruction, tutor referrals, and services for students with learning disabilities. Writing support is available in the ASC Writing Lab or in the Writing Centre, Battelle 228.

Counselling Centre (x3500, MGC 214) offers counselling and consultations regarding personal concerns, self-help information, and connections to off-campus mental health resources.

Disability Support Services (x3315, MGC 206) offers technical and practical support and assistance with accommodations for students with physical, medical, or psychological disabilities. If you qualify for accommodations because of a disability, please notify me in a timely manner with a letter from the Academic Support Centre or Disability Support Services so that we can make arrangements to address your needs.

 

Academic Integrity

The American University’s “Academic Integrity Code” governing standards for academic conduct apply. Students may discuss the subject matter of their essays with anyone. All students, however, must compose their own essays and may not show or read their essays to any other persons, except for proofreading or typing assistance by a person not enrolled or previously enrolled in the course. The use of another person’s words or ideas without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism or false authorship. Both are serious academic offenses. By turning in an essay, a student is certifying that the essay is entirely his/her own work. If there are any questions about this matter, consult the Academic Integrity Code or see the instructor. It will never be tolerated, under any circumstances and your case will be referred to the Dean – WITHOUT EXCEPTION AND IMMEDIATELY. It is your responsibility to be familiar with the University’s Academic Integrity Code, which you find on-line at: http://www.american.edu/academics/integrity/code.htm

Emergency Preparedness

In the event of a declared pandemic (influenza or other communicable disease), American University will implement a plan for meeting the needs of all members of the university community. Should the university be required to close for a period of time, we are committed to JLS-110G Western Legal Tradition Page 4 of 16 Dr. Bill Davies ensuring that all aspects of our educational programs will be delivered to our students. These may include altering and extending the duration of the traditional term schedule to complete essential instruction in the traditional format and/or use of distance instructional methods. Specific strategies will vary from class to class, depending on the format of the course and the timing of the emergency. Faculty will communicate class-specific information to students via AU e-mail and Blackboard, while students must inform their faculty immediately of any absence due to illness. Students are responsible for checking their AU e-mail regularly and keeping themselves informed of emergencies. In the event of a declared pandemic or other emergency, students should refer to the AU Web site (www. prepared. american.edu) and the AU information line at (202) 885-1100 for general university-wide information, as well as contact their faculty and/or respective dean’s office for course and school/ college-specific information.

What do I expect from you?

Punctual attendance

This is mandatory and forms part of your overall grading. Please contact me preferably prior to absence, or as soon as possible after the missed class.

Come to class prepared

Engage with your reading. With everything you read ask yourself: What the author is trying to say? From what perspective are they writing? In what social/historical/philosophical context
have they written what they have written? Do you disagree/agree with their view? Why? Don’t forget: Class Participation forms a huge part of your overall grade!

No cell phones in class

I feel from experience that hand-written notes, which are then typed up after class, are a much better way of retaining class material. Exceptions will be made only with written documentation from the disability support center.

Be honest with me

I am here to help you learn and form your opinions and I really care about doing that well. If you feel there is a certain area I could improve the class in, please don’t hesitate to let me know.
I will keep an open and friendly classroom atmosphere and am also available to talk one-on-one in my office hours/by email. I expect to see you there at least once during the semester.

Treat your peers with respect

Keep an open mind, engage with the material, participate in discussion and treat your classmates with respect. This means respecting divergent views as well as allowing them to learn – class
disruptions (walking in and out, chatting etc) will be reflected in your participation grade.

 

 

***************

Reading

CLASS SCHEDULE
Week 1      
       
Aug 27
  Introduction To Philosophical Problems
       
August 30
  Fay And Moon What Would an Adaquate Philosophy of Social Sciences Look Like?
       

PART I: The Idea of Law And Morality

Week 2 -3      
     
    Natural Law Theories  
Sept 6
  Thomas Aquainas Summa Theologica Treatise on Law QQ 90-96 (pp 1328-1373)
       
Sept 10      
    Lon Fuller
Eight Ways To Fail To Make Law Part One Part Two
    Raz The Rule of Law And Its Virtue  
    Film The Response
       
Weeks 3 & 4      
       
    What Is The Reality of Morality? (Part I)      
Sept 13
  Ayer Moral Judgment
    Bentham Anarchical Fallicies
       
  Legal Positivism: Can Law Be Evil?      
Sept 17 -20
  Austin Province of Jurisprudance Determined
    Hart Concept of Law Chapter 2
      AND Chapters 4,5,6
       
Weeks 4 & 5      
       
    What Is The Reality of Morality? (Part II)      
       
Sept 24-27   Walzer Thick and Thin, Chapt 1 Moral Minimalism
    Finnis Describing Law Normatively
       
       
       
    Constructivist Naturual Law      
       
Sept 27
  Dworkin Model of Rules
    Legal Case Riggs v Palmer
       
       
    International Law  
Weeks 5 & 6      
       
Oct 1   In Class Exam  
       
       
Oct 4
  Hart International Law
    Dworkin A New Philosophy of International Law
    Thuycidides The Melian Dialogue
       
Oct 8      
    Kant Perpetual Peace
    Rawls The Law of Peoples
       
       
       
Part II Perfectionist Theories of Law
       
    Formalism And Legal Realism  
       
Week 6-7      
       
Oct 11  

Langdell

Preface To Law On Contracts
   

Field

Magnitude And Importance of Legal Science
    Schauer Formalism (pp 509-535)
       
   

Frank

Realism
   

Llewellyn

Bramble Bush
   

Altman

Legal Realism,
       
    Law And Economics  
       
Oct 15 & 18   Murphy & Coleman Law And Economics
   

Posner

Economic Approach To Law
    Calabresi Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability
   

Legal Case

Village of Belle Terre v Boraas 416 (US) 1
   

Legal Case

US v. Carroll Towing
       
Week 8   Critical Legal Studies, Critical Race Studies And Feminist Jurisprudence.
       
Oct 22 & 25      
   

Gordon

Critical Legal Studies
   

Altman

Critical Legal Studies And Dworkin.
   

West

Jurisprudence And Gender
    Matsuda Response To Racist Speech
    Alexander The Rebirth of Caste (Chapter One)
   

Legal Case

R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)
   

Legal Case

People v. Liberta (1984) (NY)
    Legal Case State of Florida v. Rider 449 So 2nd 1984
       
       
Week 9   Interpreting The Sources of Our Law
       
Oct 29  

Brest --

Misconceived Quest For The Original Unicerstanding
    Bork Moralism, Moral Relativism And the Constitution
   

Dworkin --

Matter of Principle
       
Nov 1   Schauer -- Easy Cases
   

Tushnet

Following The Rules Laid Down Part III pp 804-827
   

Levinson

Interpreting The Ten Commandments
   

Legal Case

Brown v. Board of Education
      DC v Heller
   

 

Part III: Rights And Obligations
       
Week 10      
       
    Negative And Positive Rights        
       
Nov 5 & 8   John Stuart Mill On Liberty: Chap 4: Of The Limits of the Authority of Soceity Over The Individual
    Michael Walzer Communitarian Critics Of Liberalism
    Berlin Two Concepts of Liberty
    Legal Cases Bowers v Hardwick (1986)
      Lawrence v Texas (2003)
       
       
Nov 12   In Class Exam  
       
    The Moral Content and Limits of Law
       
     
Legal Moralism
 
       
Nov 15
  Devlin Morals And The Criminal Law
    Finnis Law Morality And Sexual Orientation
    Hart Immorality And Treason
       
Week 11      
       
Nov 19
  Locke A Letter On Toleration
    Feinberg A Ride On The Bus
    Legal Case  Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972)
    Legal Case Mozert v. Hawkins County Board of Education, 827 F. 2d 1058 (1987)
       
       
       
      Freedom of Speech  
       
Nov 26
     
    JS Mill Chapter 2 On Thought And Discussion
    MacKinnon Only Words
    Waldron Approaching Hate Speech
       
       
Week 12      
       
Nov 29   Brown Daily Herold Editorial Fighting For Safe Space
    Judith Shulevitz Hiding From Scary Ideas
    Dworkin Do We Have A Right To Pornography?
     Ismail Isa Patel The Satanic Verses, and 'The Rushdie Affair
       
       
Week 12      
       
Dec 3 & 6   Catch up and review  
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Property  
       
     
    Proto Property Feudal Beginnings....
    Honoré Ownership
    Altman Law And Economics
      Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co
      Marsh V Alabama
      Kelo v. City of New London
       
       
     
       
       
       
Week 13      
       
     
    Dworkin Review of Spheres of Justice
    Walzer Walzer's Response
     
       
       
       
Week 14      
       
  Review