Philosophical Problems In Law
Professor David Fagelson
Fall 2018
Coordinates
You will be expected to look for any class assignments either here or on our blackboard site.
::
Materials
Readings will be made available as links from the Web site.
Course Description
Content
Have you ever wondered what the difference is between the rule of law and the control of people through pure power? Have you ever thought about how you would proove that you had a certain right? Where would you look to find the sources of authority to show that you actually have a right to own a gun or that the death penalty is, or is not, cruel and unusual? Have you ever wondered why you ought to obey the law, apart from your fear of being punished? These are all philosophical questions of law of three distinct types. This course focuses on these three philosophical problems in law. The first, which is a question of definition, asks what it means to say something is the law. The second, is a question of sources. It concerns itself with where we look to find our law. The final question is one of morality. It concerns the extent and limits of our obligation to obey the law. More formally, these are respectively questions of legal, constitutional and political theory. A basic presumption of the course is that one cannot really understand these problems of law deeply without considering them together.
Skills
The majority of this course consists in abstract reasoning. Even when we apply these ideas to practical situations you will be challenged to consider them in the context of different theories of interpretion, different definitions of law and different principles of morality. It is not assumed that you have had any prior training in philosophical reasoning. However, it is assumed that you are comfortable thinking analytically and conceptually. The latter is particularly important. Philosophy concerns itself with the meaning of things. In many respects it is a matter of establishing definitions. You will not find the answer to these definitions in any dictionary or encyclopedia. In this course you will learn to parse ideas, look for internal contradictions in definitions, make analogies between different concepts and apply them all to existing problems in law and society. By the end of the course you should
- understand when institutions actually approximate some conception of the rule of law;
- be familiar with different theories of interpretation both of posited rules and moral principles.
- be familiar with different moral justifications for law and the limits of legal obligations, if any.
- be able to apply these ideas to different legal problems in public and private law.
Requirements
* Reading It is impossible to complete, let alone do well in, this class without doing each and every one of the readings. This is not a class where you can skip or forget to do the reading and just hope
to coast along.
* Active
class participation : all students are expected to attend class
regularly and to be prepared to discuss the reading. Students may be
called upon to participate in class and no passing is permitted. Each
student will be allowed 2 un-excused absences. Any additional
un-excused absence will reduce your final grade by one grade per
absence. Study the class calendar carefully to make sure you don't have
any prior commitments that would preclude you from meeting these
requirements.
* There will be two quizzes. These exercises will measure your comprehension of the reading.
* There will be a mid term and a final exam.
Grading (subject to qualification described below)
Activity |
Weight |
Assigned |
Due |
Graded |
|
|
|
|
|
Class Participation |
20% |
Passim |
|
Test |
25% |
October 1 |
In Class |
October 8 |
Test |
25% |
November 12 |
|
November 19 |
Final |
30% |
Thu, Dec 13, 2018-- 02:30PM-05:00PM |
Grading standards are in part subjective and excellence in one area may
compensate for deficiencies in another. No curve will be used to
calculate the grades in this class. Hence, it is theoretically possible
for every student to receive an A if he or she meets the standards for
that grade. My primary goals are for each student to develop the
critical thinking skills and to understand the ideas covered in this
course by the time it is completed. If later exams and papers
illustrate this proficiency, earlier grades which do not will be
discounted. The following will give you a general guide to the typical
performance associated with each letter grade.
A: all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course material and an original perspective on the subject
B:
all course requirements met, work shows full understanding of course
material (or satisfactory understanding of course material and an
original perspective on the subject)
C: all course requirements met, work shows satisfactory understanding of course material
D:
work fails to meet minimum course requirements, either in full and
timely completion of requirements or in satisfactory understanding of
course material
F: work falls far below minimum
course requirements either in full and timely completion of
requirements or in satisfactory understanding of course material.
University and Classroom Standards
Freedom of expression is at the root of academic discourse and the advancement of knowledge.
This course will deal with a wide range of topics, some of which may challenge a student’s deeply held beliefs and perhaps even cause offense. While no topic will be censored simply
because it has this effect, students are expected to treat the differing views of others with respect.
While tolerance toward the opinions of others does not preclude expressions of disagreement,
which are, indeed, encouraged, it does require that these expressions be based on the content of
the ideas expressed and not on personal traits or values of the speaker. All class participants will
be expected to tolerate the expression of opposing views and to engage in reasoned discourse
about them.
I will endeavour to insure that the classroom is free of any conduct that has the purpose or effect
of creating an intimidating or hostile environment. Furthermore, I will attempt to give each
student an opportunity to express his or her own opinion and to treat student opinions with respect. Any student who believes that he or she has not been given adequate opportunity to contribute to class discussions is encouraged to bring this to my attention.
Extremely Important: If you experience difficulty in this course for any reason, please don’t hesitate to consult with me. In addition to the resources of the department, a wide range of services is available to support you in your efforts to meet the course requirements.
Academic Support Centre (x3360, MGC 243) offers study skills workshops, individual instruction, tutor referrals, and services for students with learning disabilities. Writing support is available in the ASC Writing Lab or in the Writing Centre, Battelle 228.
Counselling Centre (x3500, MGC 214) offers counselling and consultations regarding personal concerns, self-help information, and connections to off-campus mental health resources.
Disability Support Services (x3315, MGC 206) offers technical and practical support and
assistance with accommodations for students with physical, medical, or psychological
disabilities.
If you qualify for accommodations because of a disability, please notify me in a timely manner with a letter from the Academic Support Centre or Disability Support Services so that we can make arrangements to address your needs.
Academic Integrity
The American University’s “Academic Integrity Code” governing standards for academic
conduct apply. Students may discuss the subject matter of their essays with anyone. All
students, however, must compose their own essays and may not show or read their essays to any
other persons, except for proofreading or typing assistance by a person not enrolled or previously
enrolled in the course.
The use of another person’s words or ideas without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism or false authorship. Both are serious academic offenses. By turning in an essay, a student is
certifying that the essay is entirely his/her own work. If there are any questions about this matter, consult the Academic Integrity Code or see the instructor. It will never be tolerated,
under any circumstances and your case will be referred to the Dean – WITHOUT EXCEPTION
AND IMMEDIATELY. It is your responsibility to be familiar with the University’s Academic Integrity Code, which you find on-line at: http://www.american.edu/academics/integrity/code.htm
Emergency Preparedness
In the event of a declared pandemic (influenza or other communicable disease), American
University will implement a plan for meeting the needs of all members of the university
community. Should the university be required to close for a period of time, we are committed to
JLS-110G Western Legal Tradition Page 4 of 16 Dr. Bill Davies
ensuring that all aspects of our educational programs will be delivered to our students. These
may include altering and extending the duration of the traditional term schedule to complete
essential instruction in the traditional format and/or use of distance instructional methods.
Specific strategies will vary from class to class, depending on the format of the course and the
timing of the emergency. Faculty will communicate class-specific information to students via
AU e-mail and Blackboard, while students must inform their faculty immediately of any absence
due to illness. Students are responsible for checking their AU e-mail regularly and keeping
themselves informed of emergencies. In the event of a declared pandemic or other emergency,
students should refer to the AU Web site (www. prepared. american.edu) and the AU
information line at (202) 885-1100 for general university-wide information, as well as contact
their faculty and/or respective dean’s office for course and school/ college-specific information.
What do I expect from you?
Punctual attendance
This is mandatory and forms part of your overall grading. Please contact me preferably prior to absence, or as soon as possible after the missed class.
Come to class prepared
Engage with your reading. With everything you read ask yourself: What the author is trying to say? From what perspective are they writing? In what social/historical/philosophical context
have they written what they have written? Do you disagree/agree with their view? Why? Don’t
forget: Class Participation forms a huge part of your overall grade!
No cell phones in class
I feel from experience that hand-written notes, which are then typed up after class, are a much better way of retaining class material. Exceptions will be made only with written documentation from the disability support center.
Be honest with me
I am here to help you learn and form your opinions and I really care about doing that well. If
you feel there is a certain area I could improve the class in, please don’t hesitate to let me know.
I will keep an open and friendly classroom atmosphere and am also available to talk one-on-one
in my office hours/by email. I expect to see you there at least once during the semester.
Treat your peers with respect
Keep an open mind, engage with the material, participate in discussion and treat your classmates with respect. This means respecting divergent views as well as allowing them to learn – class
disruptions (walking in and out, chatting etc) will be reflected in your participation grade.
***************
Reading
|
CLASS SCHEDULE
|
Week 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 |
|
Introduction To Philosophical Problems |
|
|
|
|
August 30 |
|
Fay And Moon |
What Would an Adaquate Philosophy of Social Sciences Look Like? |
|
|
|
|
PART I: The Idea of Law And Morality |
|
Week 2 -3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Law Theories |
|
Sept 6 |
|
Thomas Aquainas |
Summa Theologica Treatise on Law QQ 90-96 (pp 1328-1373) |
|
|
|
|
Sept 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lon Fuller |
|
|
|
Raz |
The Rule of Law And Its Virtue |
|
|
|
Film |
The Response |
|
|
|
|
Weeks 3 & 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What Is The Reality of Morality? (Part I) |
|
|
|
Sept 13 |
|
Ayer |
Moral Judgment |
|
|
Bentham |
Anarchical Fallicies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Positivism: Can Law Be Evil? |
|
|
|
Sept 17 -20 |
|
Austin |
Province of Jurisprudance Determined |
|
|
Hart |
Concept of Law Chapter 2 |
|
|
|
AND Chapters 4,5,6 |
|
|
|
|
Weeks 4 & 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What Is The Reality of Morality? (Part II) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 24-27 |
|
Walzer |
Thick and Thin, Chapt 1 Moral Minimalism |
|
|
Finnis |
Describing Law Normatively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constructivist Naturual Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 27 |
|
Dworkin |
Model of Rules |
|
|
Legal Case |
Riggs v Palmer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weeks 5 & 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 1 |
|
In Class Exam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 |
|
Hart |
International Law |
|
|
Dworkin |
A New Philosophy of International Law |
|
|
Thuycidides |
The Melian Dialogue |
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kant |
Perpetual Peace |
|
|
Rawls |
The Law of Peoples |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II Perfectionist Theories of Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formalism And Legal Realism |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 6-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 11 |
|
Langdell |
Preface To Law On Contracts |
|
|
Field |
Magnitude And Importance of Legal Science |
|
|
Schauer |
Formalism (pp 509-535) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank |
Realism |
|
|
Llewellyn |
Bramble Bush |
|
|
Altman |
Legal Realism, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Law And Economics |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 & 18 |
|
Murphy & Coleman |
Law And Economics |
|
|
Posner |
Economic Approach To Law |
|
|
Calabresi |
Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability |
|
|
Legal Case |
Village of Belle Terre v Boraas 416 (US) 1 |
|
|
Legal Case |
US v. Carroll Towing |
|
|
|
|
Week 8 |
|
Critical Legal Studies, Critical Race Studies And Feminist Jurisprudence. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 22 & 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gordon |
Critical Legal Studies |
|
|
Altman |
Critical Legal Studies And Dworkin. |
|
|
West |
Jurisprudence And Gender |
|
|
Matsuda |
Response To Racist Speech |
|
|
Alexander |
The Rebirth of Caste (Chapter One) |
|
|
Legal Case |
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992) |
|
|
Legal Case |
People v. Liberta (1984) (NY) |
|
|
Legal Case |
State of Florida v. Rider 449 So 2nd 1984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 9 |
|
Interpreting The Sources of Our Law |
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 |
|
Brest -- |
Misconceived Quest For The Original Unicerstanding |
|
|
Bork |
Moralism, Moral Relativism And the Constitution |
|
|
Dworkin -- |
Matter of Principle |
|
|
|
|
Nov 1 |
|
Schauer -- |
Easy Cases |
|
|
Tushnet |
Following The Rules Laid Down Part III pp 804-827 |
|
|
Levinson |
Interpreting The Ten Commandments |
|
|
Legal Case |
Brown v. Board of Education |
|
|
|
DC v Heller |
|
|
|
|
Part III: Rights And Obligations |
|
|
|
|
Week 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative And Positive Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 & 8 |
|
John Stuart Mill |
On Liberty: Chap 4: |
|
|
Michael Walzer |
Communitarian Critics Of Liberalism |
|
|
Berlin |
Two Concepts of Liberty |
|
|
Legal Cases |
Bowers v Hardwick (1986) |
|
|
|
Lawrence v Texas (2003) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 |
|
In Class Exam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Moral Content and Limits of Law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Moralism |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 |
|
Devlin |
Morals And The Criminal Law |
|
|
Finnis |
Law Morality And Sexual Orientation |
|
|
Hart |
Immorality And Treason |
|
|
|
|
Week 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 19 |
|
Locke |
A Letter On Toleration |
|
|
Feinberg |
A Ride On The Bus |
|
|
Legal Case |
Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) |
|
|
Legal Case |
Mozert v. Hawkins County Board of Education, 827 F. 2d 1058 (1987) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom of Speech |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26 |
|
|
|
|
|
JS Mill |
Chapter 2 On Thought And Discussion |
|
|
MacKinnon |
Only Words |
|
|
Waldron |
Approaching Hate Speech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 |
|
Brown Daily Herold Editorial |
Fighting For Safe Space |
|
|
Judith Shulevitz |
Hiding From Scary Ideas |
|
|
Dworkin |
Do We Have A Right To Pornography? |
|
|
Ismail Isa Patel |
The Satanic Verses, and 'The Rushdie Affair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 & 6 |
|
Catch up and review |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proto Property |
Feudal Beginnings.... |
|
|
Honoré |
Ownership |
|
|
Altman |
Law And Economics |
|
|
|
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co |
|
|
|
Marsh V Alabama |
|
|
|
Kelo v. City of New London |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dworkin |
Review of Spheres of Justice |
|
|
Walzer |
Walzer's Response |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|